 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
To get the exact measurements, you would need to |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
CPARK@Powertrix.com on May 25, 2005 at 4:51 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 139 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
My 1 question about the FUCA design you have: posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on May 25, 2005 at 04:17 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
have the car on the alignment rack and set it up properly. However, there are just too many variables to that measurement based what coilovers, springs, etc. are on the car as every car will be different. The camber arms alone do not determine the measurement of + or - degrees of camber. I do know what you are getting at and there is plenty and more than enough threaded end in the center of the arm to provide ample support of the arm. Logic is that the more threaded section that is in the center of the arm, the more sturdy it will be. TRUE. The more negative camber you dial into the arms, the more thread you will have in the center section. 0 degrees (wheel standing straight up and down) of camber is the absolute max anyone would go for a drag car only setup. This set up would not be street able as it would not handle at all. A +1 degree of camber adjustment would never be used in any application. Why would you want a +1 degree of camber? Depending on the application, ride height, tire and rim size etc, even a 0 degree setting can be impossible on the Z32 and is never used. Even at the closest setting to 0 degrees of camber that we have acquired, the arms have plenty of thread inside the center of the arm for structure ability. Plainly stated, our camber arms maintain their structure ability at any setting placed on a Z32.
Sincerely
Charles Park
POWERTRIX
Performance & Styling
Office 858-566-5060
Mobile 619-944-6055
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
